It enables a praxis which is placed in the condition of treating the Real by the Symbolic an only partial treatment since the Symbolic does not have the last signifier able to fully tell the Real of the subject. We see, with psychoanalysis, a paradigmatic revolution in the epistemological field, while laying emphasis on the subjective production always via the subject. We speak about active subjectivity, which continues to produce new signifiers: production of new meanings from the subject-effects. This is because it is produced from the cascade of signifiers, like a swarm of meaning and it is in constant motion, the reasons enunciated the hypothesis of subjective processing. A subject that is not limited to a signifier, but it emerges from the symbolic movement to be represented by a signifier to other signifiers. Psychoanalysis elucidates a subject beyond I (Ego/Moi), as the speech deflagrates the hole in the speech. To this end, we outlined the theories of subject and subjectivity, as well as the vision of "science" and knowledge production that is made possible from these concepts. Taking psychoanalysis of Freud and Lacan as a reference, we seek to weave previous theoretical considerations of an Intercession-Research in the Collective Mental Health context. Subject, subjectivity and "science" in Freud and Lacan: some prior theoretical considerations to an intercession-research in the field of collective mental health.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |